About the SSU

For those of you who don't know what the SSU is about. It's a group of adults who enjoy being spanked but also enjoy teasing their spankers (all in fun of course) about unfair spankings, their choice of implements, their lack of attention or their abundance of attention. Pretty much anything a bratty spankee wants to share is always welcome here at the SSU. Being a fair and (kinda) equal union, we do let the spankers defend themselves and then the Union members vote whether the potential violation is valid or not. Yes, sometimes even us spankees can be wrong. Above all else, it's a lot of fun and a chance to get to know others who enjoy this thing we do. So come on in, join and unite! It's your union!


April 28, 2011

SSU Violation - Repetitive Charges for a possible Repeat Offender

Repetitive Charges Against Thomas

On Thursday, April 7, 2011 10:56 PM


SSU Member Katia Spade reported (for the 2nd time) Thomas for giving her once again an unjustified and undeserved spanking.  The charge has been filed as shown below:


SSU Violation - Repetitive Charges for a possible Repeat Offender

Another SSU Violation from Thomas has been charged. After a unanimous vote of 8 to 0, Thomas was found guilty of spanking unnecessarily and without legitimate reason. The SSU expects a full confession and reason for this 'repeat offense' by the guilty spanking party.

Katia requests this charge as follows: 

I would like to file another charge against Thomas. I was spanked Tuesday on video for reporting him to the SSU. I still feel I am not guilty. When he is standing over you with a large wood paddle and the camera is rolling, I am not about to argue with him. I took 70 swats, 20 for reporting, and 5 swats per vote. I say, "GUILTY!"



Katia is clearly distraught as is understandable since Thomas has already been found guilty by a unanimous vote for the original charge and so this response spanking is clearly unjustified as well.  When we have a repeat offense, we give the accused a chance to offer a response in his own defense for why he feels it was necessary to spank Katia again for this offense he's being charged of.


We urge all SSU members to vote on this and give as much input as to why came to this decision so that hopefully this unfair behavior will not continue.

3 comments:

Pink said...

Guilty.

The votes were unanimous. There should be some sort of whistle-blower protection. Don't people get in trouble for disciplining the whistle-blowers?

Thomas should just accept that he was in the wrong and say he's sorry. :)

Jean said...

I say guilty

Scunge said...

Sorry Thomas but that WAS most unfair! Guilty again.